Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38519867›Full record

ArticleOTJR : occupation, participation and health2024

Application of the Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance Model: A Scoping Review.

Julie D Bass, Josephine K Marchant, Stephanie L de Sam Lazaro, Carolyn M Baum

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in OTJR : occupation, participation and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Convergent Validity Between Two Adult Self-Report Sensory Processing Scales.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie D BassSt. Catherine University, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-5917-5902
Josephine K MarchantSt. Catherine University, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-5770-1111
Stephanie L de Sam LazaroSt. Catherine University, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1772-799X
Carolyn M BaumWashington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7972-1200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) Model is one of several occupation-based models in occupational therapy. The model describes the transactional nature of person, environment, and occupation factors that support performance (doing), participation (engagement), and well-being (health and quality of life). The purpose of this study was to explore the extent and nature of evidence on the PEOP Model. We used a scoping review to identify and analyze journal articles that used the PEOP Model as a framework for study. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria were used to develop the research methods. We found 109 articles that adopted the PEOP Model as an organizing framework. The studies reviewed represent the breadth of occupational therapy practice and the transactional nature of person, environment, occupation, and performance in the PEOP Model. The PEOP Model is a useful international framework for research and practice across populations, conditions, life circumstances, settings, and areas of practice.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyEnvironmentHumansModels, TheoreticalQuality of Lifeoccupation-based modelsPEOP Modelperson–environment–occupation–performance modelscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38519867
PMCPMC11180417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.