ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2024
Highly Sensitive Detection of Melanin in Melanomas Using Multi-harmonic Low Frequency EPR.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) meets drug delivery and biomaterials: a magnetic love story.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Celebration of 80 years of EPR.Applied magnetic resonance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLow frequency EPR can noninvasively detect endogenous free radical melanin in melanocytic skin lesions and could potentially discriminate between benign atypical nevi and malignant melanoma lesions. We recently succeeded in demonstrating the ability of clinical EPR to noninvasively detect the endogenous melanin free radical in skin lesions of patients. However, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was extremely low warranting further research to boost the sensitivity of detection. In the present study, we assessed the performance of a clinical EPR system with the capability to perform multi-harmonic (MH) analysis for the detection of melanin. PROCEDURES: The sensitivity of MH-EPR was compared with a classical continuous wave (CW)-EPR (1st harmonic) detection in vitro in melanin phantoms, in vivo in melanoma models with cells implanted in the skin, in lymph nodes and having colonized the lungs, and finally on phantoms placed at the surface of human skin.
resultsIn vitro, we observed an increase in SNR by a factor of 10 in flat melanin phantoms when using MH analysis compared to CW combined with an increase in modulation amplitude. In B16 melanomas having grown in the skin of hairless mice, we observed a boost in sensitivity in vivo similar to that observed in vitro with the capability to detect melanoma cells at an earlier stage of development. MH-EPR was also able to detect non-invasively the melanin signal coming from melanoma cells present in lymph nodes as well as in lungs. We also observed a boost of sensitivity using phantoms of melanin placed at the surface of human skin.
conclusionsOverall, our results are paving the way for new clinical trials that will use MH clinical EPR for the characterization of pigmented skin lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.