Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38519793›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2024

Combining activity and grimace scores reflects perinatal stability in infants <32 weeks gestational age.

Zachary Tuttle, Calum Roberts, Peter Davis, Atul Malhotra, Kenneth Tan, Risha Bhatia, Lindsay Zhou, Elizabeth Baker, Kate Hodgson, Douglas Blank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zachary TuttleThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. zatuttle@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-5879
Calum RobertsThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Peter DavisWomen's Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Atul MalhotraThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Kenneth TanThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Risha BhatiaThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Lindsay ZhouThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Elizabeth BakerWomen's Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Kate HodgsonWomen's Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Douglas BlankThe Ritchie Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

CAUL and its Member Institutions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 95% of infants less than 32 weeks gestational age-very preterm infants (VPTI)-require cardiorespiratory support at birth. Clinical condition at birth is assessed by the Apgar score, but the precision and accuracy of activity and grimace has not been evaluated. We hypothesised activity and grimace could predict the level of cardiorespiratory support required for stabilisation.

methodsTwo hundred twenty-nine videos of VPTI resuscitations at Monash Children's Hospital and The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne were evaluated, with 78 videos eligible for assessment. Activity and grimace were scored (0, 1, or 2) by seven consultant neonatologists, with inter-rater reliability assessed. Activity and grimace were correlated with the maximum level of cardiorespiratory support required for stabilisation.

resultsKendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W) showed strong interobserver agreement for activity (W = 0.644, p < 0.001) and grimace (W = 0.722, p < 0.001). Neither activity nor grimace independently predicted the level of cardiorespiratory support required. Combining activity and grimace showed non-vigorous infants (combined score <2) received more cardiorespiratory support than vigorous (combined score ≥ 2).

conclusionScoring of activity and grimace was consistent between clinicians. Independently, activity and grimace did not correlate with perinatal stabilisation. Combined scoring showed non-vigorous infants had greater resuscitation requirements. IMPACT: Our study evaluates the precision and accuracy of activity and grimace to predict perinatal stability, which has not been validated in infants <32 weeks gestational age. We found strong score agreement between assessors, indicating video review is a practical and precise method for grading of activity and grimace. Combined scoring to allow a dichotomous evaluation of infants as non-vigorous or vigorous showed the former group required greater cardiorespiratory support at birth.

Indexed as

Apgar ScoreGestational AgeFemaleHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsResuscitationVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID38519793
PMCPMC11502514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.