Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38519702›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2024

Single-cell Profiling of Reprogrammed Human Neural Stem Cells Unveils High Similarity to Neural Progenitors in the Developing Central Nervous System.

Angeliki Spathopoulou, Martina Podlesnic, Laura De Gaetano, Elena Marie Kirsch, Marcel Tisch, Francesca Finotello, Ludwig Aigner, Katharina Günther, Frank Edenhofer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angeliki SpathopoulouDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9239-6222
Martina PodlesnicDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Laura De GaetanoDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elena Marie KirschInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5617-3873
Marcel TischDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3907-6657
Francesca FinotelloDepartment of Molecular Biology, Digital Science Center (DiSC), University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0712-4658
Ludwig AignerInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1653-8046
Katharina GüntherDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2954-4883
Frank EdenhoferDepartment of Molecular Biology & CMBI, Genomics, Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine Group, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. Frank.Edenhofer@uibk.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-714X
Universität Innsbruck · ATParacelsus Medical University · ATInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF T 974fwf F7804-B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimilar to induced pluripotent cells (iPSCs), induced neural stem cells (iNSCs) can be directly converted from human somatic cells such as dermal fibroblasts and peripheral blood monocytes. While previous studies have demonstrated the resemblance of iNSCs to neural stem cells derived from primary sources and embryonic stem cells, respectively, a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between iNSCs and their physiological counterparts remained to be investigated.

methodsNowadays, single-cell sequencing technologies provide unique opportunities for in-depth cellular benchmarking of complex cell populations. Our study involves the comprehensive profiling of converted human iNSCs at a single-cell transcriptomic level, alongside conventional methods, like flow cytometry and immunofluorescence stainings.

resultsOur results show that the iNSC conversion yields a homogeneous cell population expressing bona fide neural stem cell markers. Extracting transcriptomic signatures from published single cell transcriptomic atlas data and comparison to the iNSC transcriptome reveals resemblance to embryonic neuroepithelial cells of early neurodevelopmental stages observed in vivo at 5 weeks of development.

conclusionOur data underscore the physiological relevance of directly converted iNSCs, making them a valuable in vitro system for modeling human central nervous system development and establishing translational applications in cell therapy and compound screening.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsSingle-Cell AnalysisCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHumansTranscriptomeCellular benchmarkingCNS developmentNeural regenerationNeural stem cellsNeuroepithelial cellsReprogramming

Identifiers

PMID38519702
PMCPMC11222274
OpenAlexW4393079645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.