Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38519488›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Niche availability and competitive loss by facilitation control proliferation of bacterial strains intended for soil microbiome interventions.

Senka Čaušević, Manupriyam Dubey, Marian Morales, Guillem Salazar, Vladimir Sentchilo, Nicolas Carraro, Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh, Shinichi Sunagawa, Jan Roelof van der Meer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Senka ČauševićDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7930-3968
Manupriyam DubeyDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6909-0310
Marian MoralesDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3900-9369
Guillem SalazarDepartment of Biology Institute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-1493
Vladimir SentchiloDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2493-570X
Nicolas CarraroDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-547X
Hans-Joachim RuscheweyhDepartment of Biology Institute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7473-6086
Shinichi SunagawaDepartment of Biology Institute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-0314
Jan Roelof van der MeerDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Janroelof.vandermeer@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-3082
University of Lausanne · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) CRSII5 189919/1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) SystemsX.ch 2013/158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome engineering - the targeted manipulation of microbial communities - is considered a promising strategy to restore ecosystems, but experimental support and mechanistic understanding are required. Here, we show that bacterial inoculants for soil microbiome engineering may fail to establish because they inadvertently facilitate growth of native resident microbiomes. By generating soil microcosms in presence or absence of standardized soil resident communities, we show how different nutrient availabilities limit outgrowth of focal bacterial inoculants (three Pseudomonads), and how this might be improved by adding an artificial, inoculant-selective nutrient niche. Through random paired interaction assays in agarose micro-beads, we demonstrate that, in addition to direct competition, inoculants lose competitiveness by facilitating growth of resident soil bacteria. Metatranscriptomics experiments with toluene as selective nutrient niche for the inoculant Pseudomonas veronii indicate that this facilitation is due to loss and uptake of excreted metabolites by resident taxa. Generation of selective nutrient niches for inoculants may help to favor their proliferation for the duration of their intended action while limiting their competitive loss.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsMicrobiotaBacteriaCell ProliferationSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID38519488
PMCPMC10959995
OpenAlexW4393090115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.