Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38518758›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2024

Development and external validation of a dynamic risk score for early prediction of cardiogenic shock in cardiac intensive care units using machine learning.

Yuxuan Hu, Albert Lui, Mark Goldstein, Mukund Sudarshan, Andrea Tinsay, Cindy Tsui, Samuel D Maidman, John Medamana, Neil Jethani, Aahlad Puli and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuxuan HuLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7091-5690
Albert LuiNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Mark GoldsteinCourant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA.
Mukund SudarshanCourant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA.
Andrea TinsayDepartment of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Cindy TsuiDepartment of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Samuel D MaidmanDepartment of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
John MedamanaDepartment of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Neil JethaniNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Aahlad PuliCourant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA.
Vuthy NguyDepartment of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Yindalon AphinyanaphongsDepartment of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Nicholas KieferLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Nathaniel R SmilowitzLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
James HorowitzLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Tania AhujaDepartment of Pharmacy, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Glenn I FishmanLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Judith HochmanLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Stuart KatzLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Samuel BernardLeon. H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Rajesh RanganathCourant Institute of Mathematics, New York University, New York, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences · USNew York University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAININGT32GM007308 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PHILIPS, MARK REID · 1985 to 2019
$23.2M
Training Program in Cardiovascular SciencesT32HL098129 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Glenn I Fishman, Ira J Goldberg · 2009 to 2026
$5.9M
Deep probabilistic predictive models for stroke and coronary heart diseaseR01HL148248 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI RANGANATH, RAJESH · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148248NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL148248NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098129NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007308NIH HHS T32HL098129NSF 1922658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMyocardial infarction and heart failure are major cardiovascular diseases that affect millions of people in the USA with morbidity and mortality being highest among patients who develop cardiogenic shock. Early recognition of cardiogenic shock allows prompt implementation of treatment measures. Our objective is to develop a new dynamic risk score, called CShock, to improve early detection of cardiogenic shock in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS AND

resultsWe developed and externally validated a deep learning-based risk stratification tool, called CShock, for patients admitted into the cardiac ICU with acute decompensated heart failure and/or myocardial infarction to predict the onset of cardiogenic shock. We prepared a cardiac ICU dataset using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III database by annotating with physician-adjudicated outcomes. This dataset which consisted of 1500 patients with 204 having cardiogenic/mixed shock was then used to train CShock. The features used to train the model for CShock included patient demographics, cardiac ICU admission diagnoses, routinely measured laboratory values and vital signs, and relevant features manually extracted from echocardiogram and left heart catheterization reports. We externally validated the risk model on the New York University (NYU) Langone Health cardiac ICU database which was also annotated with physician-adjudicated outcomes. The external validation cohort consisted of 131 patients with 25 patients experiencing cardiogenic/mixed shock. CShock achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.821 (95% CI 0.792-0.850). CShock was externally validated in the more contemporary NYU cohort and achieved an AUROC of 0.800 (95% CI 0.717-0.884), demonstrating its generalizability in other cardiac ICUs. Having an elevated heart rate is most predictive of cardiogenic shock development based on Shapley values. The other top 10 predictors are having an admission diagnosis of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, having an admission diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure, Braden Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, blood urea nitrogen, systolic blood pressure, serum chloride, serum sodium, and arterial blood pH.

conclusionThe novel CShock score has the potential to provide automated detection and early warning for cardiogenic shock and improve the outcomes for millions of patients who suffer from myocardial infarction and heart failure.

Indexed as

Machine LearningShock, CardiogenicAgedCoronary Care UnitsEarly DiagnosisFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveCardiac critical careData scienceHeart failureMachine learningMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID38518758
PMCPMC11214586
OpenAlexW4393097574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.