ArticlePloS one2024
Exploring the potential of bis(thiazol-5-yl)phenylmethane derivatives as novel candidates against genetically defined multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of 3-[(4-Acetylphenyl)(4-Phenylthiazol-2-Yl)Amino]Propanoic Acid Derivatives as Promising Scaffolds for the Development of Novel Anticancer Candidates Targeting SIRT2 and EGFR.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial activity of α/β hybrid peptides incorporating tBu-βThe Journal of antibiotics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents an alarming global challenge to public health. Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) pose an emerging global threat. Therefore, it is crucial to develop novel compounds with promising antimicrobial activity against S. aureus especially those with challenging resistance mechanisms and biofilm formation. Series of bis(thiazol-5-yl)phenylmethane derivatives were evaluated against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. The screening revealed an S. aureus-selective mechanism of bis(thiazol-5-yl)phenylmethane derivatives (MIC 2-64 μg/mL), while significantly lower activity was observed with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (MIC 64 μg/mL) (p<0.05). The most active phenylmethane-based (p-tolyl) derivative, 23a, containing nitro and dimethylamine substituents, and the naphthalene-based derivative, 28b, harboring fluorine and nitro substituents, exhibited strong, near MIC bactericidal activity against S. aureus with genetically defined resistance phenotypes such as MSSA, MRSA, and VRSA and their biofilms. The in silico modeling revealed that most promising compounds 23a and 28b were predicted to bind S. aureus MurC ligase. The 23a and 28b formed bonds with MurC residues at binding site, specifically Ser12 and Arg375, indicating consequential interactions essential for complex stability. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of compound 28b was not affected by the addition of 50% serum. Finally, all tested bis(thiazol-5-yl)phenylmethane derivatives showed favorable cytotoxicity profiles in A549 and THP-1-derived macrophage models. These results demonstrated that bis(thiazol-5-yl)phenylmethane derivatives 23a and 28b could be potentially explored as scaffolds for the development of novel candidates targeting drug-resistant S. aureus. Further studies are also warranted to understand in vivo safety, efficacy, and pharmacological bioavailability of bis(thiazol-5-yl)phenylmethane derivatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.