Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38517824›Full record

Trial reportTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2024

Personalised graded psychological intervention on negative emotion and quality of life in patients with breast cancer.

Xianjie Hao, Yanli Yi, Xian Lin, Jie Li, Cheng Chen, Yanfeng Shen, Yuhang Sun, Jinglan He

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xianjie HaoDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Yanli YiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Xian LinDepartment of Geriatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Cheng ChenSecond Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Yanfeng ShenSecond Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Yuhang SunDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Jinglan HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, Handan, Hebei, China.
Hebei University of Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological factors are a risk factor for the incidence of breast cancer and have a significant impact on patient prognosis.

objectiveThe present study aims to investigate the effects of personalised graded psychological intervention on negative emotion and quality of life in patients with breast cancer.

methodsA total of 200 patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group (n= 100) and control group (n= 100). Both groups received routine nursing care. The experimental group received personalised graded psychological intervention care, and the control group received routine nursing measures. After 2 months of standard treatment, the patients' quality of life and negative emotions were evaluated using the self-rating depression scale (SDS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), social support rating scale (SSRS) and quality of life measurement scale (FACT-B) scoring criteria.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the general data between the two groups (p> 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the SDS, SAS, SSRS and FACT-B scores between the two groups before personalised graded psychological intervention (p> 0.05). After the intervention, the experimental group exhibited an improved nursing effect compared with the control group. The SDS and SAS scores were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p< 0.05); after the intervention, the SDS and SAS scores were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p< 0.05). The SSRS and FACT-B scores were higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p< 0.05), and the experimental group's post-intervention SSRS and FACT-B scores were significantly higher than before the intervention (p< 0.05).

conclusionsThe use of personalised graded psychological intervention for the nursing of patients with breast cancer in clinical practice can significantly reduce patients' negative emotions as well as improve positive emotions and quality of life; thus, this method can be popularised in the nursing process.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEmotionsQuality of LifeAdultAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychosocial InterventionSocial Supportbreast cancernegative emotionsPersonalised gradingpsychological interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38517824
PMCPMC11307000
OpenAlexW4393080593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.