Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38517800›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2024

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Nicoline Voet, Ronne Pater, Joana Garmendia, Andone Sistiaga, Garazi Labayru, Benjamin Gallais, Ingrid de Groot, Samar Muslemani, Cynthia Gagnon, Christopher Graham

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Nicoline VoetKlimmendaal, Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Ronne PaterKlimmendaal, Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Joana GarmendiaDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methodology; Psychology Faculty, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Andone SistiagaDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methodology; Psychology Faculty, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Garazi LabayruDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methodology; Psychology Faculty, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.
Benjamin GallaisÉCOBES, research and transfer, Cégep de Jonquière, Jonquière, Canada.
Ingrid de GrootPatient association Spierziekten Nederland, Baarn, The Netherlands.
Samar MuslemaniMedicine & Health Sciences Faculty, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; CR-CHUS and CIUSSS Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean research centres, Québec, Canada.
Cynthia GagnonMedicine & Health Sciences Faculty, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; CR-CHUS and CIUSSS Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean research centres, Québec, Canada.
Christopher GrahamDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Scotland.
University of the Basque Country · ESRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversité de Sherbrooke · CACégep de Jonquière · CAUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable in comprehensively understanding patients' health experiences and informing healthcare decisions in research and clinical care without clinicians' input. Until now, no central resource containing information on all PROMS in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) is available, hindering the comparison and choice of PROMs used to monitor NMDs and appropriately reflect the patient's voice. This scoping review aimed to present a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on using PROMs in children and adults with NMD. A scoping methodology was followed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines to assess the literature on PROMs in NMDs. Eligibility criteria encompassed articles describing psychometric development or evaluation of generic or disease-specific PROM-based instruments for adults and children with specific NMDs. The data charting process involved extracting measurement properties of included PROMs, comprising validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability information. The review identified 190 PROMs evaluated across 247 studies in individuals with NMDs. The majority of PROMs were disease specific. The physical functioning domain was most assessed. Validity was the most frequently investigated measurement property, with a limited number of PROMs sufficiently evaluated for a range of psychometric characteristics. There is a strong need for further research on the responsiveness and interpretability of PROMs and the development of PROMs on social functioning in NMD.

Indexed as

Neuromuscular DiseasesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultChildHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of Resultshealth-related quality of lifemeasurement propertiesNeuromuscular diseasespatient-reported outcome measuresscoping reviewvalidation of measurement instruments

Identifiers

PMID38517800
PMCPMC11091642
OpenAlexW4392949251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.