ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
ReHoGCNES-MDA: prediction of miRNA-disease associations using homogenous graph convolutional networks based on regular graph with random edge sampler.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph Learning in Bioinformatics: A Survey of Graph Neural Network Architectures, Biological Graph Construction and Bioinformatics Applications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- OptimDase: An Algorithm for Predicting DNA Binding Sites with Combined Feature Encoding.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- CoupleMDA: Metapath-Induced Structural-Semantic Coupling Network for miRNA-Disease Association Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Immune status assessment based on plasma proteomics with meta graph convolutional networks.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Advancing miRNA cancer research through artificial intelligence: from biomarker discovery to therapeutic targeting.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous investigations increasingly indicate the significance of microRNA (miRNA) in human diseases. Hence, unearthing associations between miRNA and diseases can contribute to precise diagnosis and efficacious remediation of medical conditions. The detection of miRNA-disease linkages via computational techniques utilizing biological information has emerged as a cost-effective and highly efficient approach. Here, we introduced a computational framework named ReHoGCNES, designed for prospective miRNA-disease association prediction (ReHoGCNES-MDA). This method constructs homogenous graph convolutional network with regular graph structure (ReHoGCN) encompassing disease similarity network, miRNA similarity network and known MDA network and then was tested on four experimental tasks. A random edge sampler strategy was utilized to expedite processes and diminish training complexity. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed ReHoGCNES-MDA method outperforms both homogenous graph convolutional network and heterogeneous graph convolutional network with non-regular graph structure in all four tasks, which implicitly reveals steadily degree distribution of a graph does play an important role in enhancement of model performance. Besides, ReHoGCNES-MDA is superior to several machine learning algorithms and state-of-the-art methods on the MDA prediction. Furthermore, three case studies were conducted to further demonstrate the predictive ability of ReHoGCNES. Consequently, 93.3% (breast neoplasms), 90% (prostate neoplasms) and 93.3% (prostate neoplasms) of the top 30 forecasted miRNAs were validated by public databases. Hence, ReHoGCNES-MDA might serve as a dependable and beneficial model for predicting possible MDAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.