ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2024
Capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleed in the tropics: A single-center experience on 350 patients.
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObscure gastrointestinal bleed (OGIB), now called small bowel bleed (SBB), comprises 5% to 10% of all gastrointestinal (GI) bleed episodes and capsule endoscopy (CE) is a tool for its evaluation. Studies on CE in a large sample of SBB patients from the tropics are limited.
methodsWe did a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with SBB undergoing CE using PillCam or MiroCam CE.
resultsOf 350 patients (age 52.4 ± 17.4 years; 248 [70.9%] male) undergoing CE, 243 (69.4%) and 107 (30.6%) had overt and occult SBB, respectively. CE detected lesions in 244 (69.7%) patients (single lesion in 172 [49.1%]; multiple in 72 [20.6%]). The single lesions included vascular malformations (52, 14.9%), ulcer/erosion (47, 13.4%), tumor (24, 6.9%), hookworm (19, 5.4%), stricture (15, 4.3%), hemobilia (1, 0.3%) and blood without identifiable lesion (9, 2.6%). Of 72 with multiple lesions, ulcer with stricture was the commonest finding (n = 43, 12.3%). No abnormality was detected in 106 (30.3%) patients. The frequency of lesion detection was comparable among patients with overt and occult SBB (173/243, 71.2% vs. 71/107, 66.3%, respectively; p = 0.4). Younger patients (0 to 39 years) more often had multiple lesions on CE than the older (≥ 40 years) ones (26/76, 34.2% vs. 46/228, 20.2%, respectively; p = 0.001).
conclusionCE has a high diagnostic yield in SBB in the tropics, regardless of the type of bleed or of CE brand and the duration of recording. Multiple lesions associated with SBB are commoner among younger (< 40 years) patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.