ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Deep learning-based 3D cerebrovascular segmentation workflow on bright and black blood sequences magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated error localisation and correction techniques for deep-learning-based segmentation of 3D MRI sequences based on feature-derived-region aggregation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based vessel segmentation in non-contrast black-blood MRI for treated aneurysm follow-up: a comparative study with TOF-MRA and DSA.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning accurately and reliably segments pelvic vascular structure in CT scans of gynecologic cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- GA-TAN: a graph aggregation and topology-aware network for unified 3D ocular-cerebral vascular segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Using swin UNETR deep model for automated detection of alveolar bone fenestration/dehiscence in CBCT.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebrovascular diseases have emerged as significant threats to human life and health. Effectively segmenting brain blood vessels has become a crucial scientific challenge. We aimed to develop a fully automated deep learning workflow that achieves accurate 3D segmentation of cerebral blood vessels by incorporating classic convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer models.
methodsWe used a public cerebrovascular segmentation dataset (CSD) containing 45 volumes of 1.5 T time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography images. We collected data from another private middle cerebral artery (MCA) with lenticulostriate artery (LSA) segmentation dataset (MLD), which encompassed 3.0 T three-dimensional T1-weighted sequences of volumetric isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition MRI images of 107 patients aged 62 ± 11 years (42 females). The workflow includes data analysis, preprocessing, augmentation, model training with validation, and postprocessing techniques. Brain vessels were segmented using the U-Net, V-Net, UNETR, and SwinUNETR models. The model performances were evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average surface distance (ASD), precision (PRE), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE).
resultsDuring 4-fold cross-validation, SwinUNETR obtained the highest DSC in each fold. On the CSD test set, SwinUNETR achieved the best DSC (0.853), PRE (0.848), SEN (0.860), and SPE (0.9996), while V-Net achieved the best ASD (0.99). On the MLD test set, SwinUNETR demonstrated good MCA segmentation performance and had the best DSC, ASD, PRE, and SPE for segmenting the LSA.
conclusionsThe workflow demonstrated excellent performance on different sequences of MRI images for vessels of varying sizes. This method allows doctors to visualize cerebrovascular structures. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A deep learning-based 3D cerebrovascular segmentation workflow is feasible and promising for visualizing cerebrovascular structures and monitoring cerebral small vessels, such as lenticulostriate arteries. KEY POINTS: • The proposed deep learning-based workflow performs well in cerebrovascular segmentation tasks. • Among comparison models, SwinUNETR achieved the best DSC, ASD, PRE, and SPE values in lenticulostriate artery segmentation. • The proposed workflow can be used for different MR sequences, such as bright and black blood imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.