Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38517604›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024

Assessing Regurgitation Severity, Adverse Remodeling, and Fibrosis with CMR in Aortic Regurgitation.

Mujtaba Saeed, Akila Bersali, Amr Darwish, Fatima Qamar, Dimitrios Maragiannis, Kinan Carlos El-Tallawi, Maan Malahfji, Dipan J Shah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Incidence and Pathology of Aortic Regurgitation.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mujtaba SaeedCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Akila BersaliCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Amr DarwishCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Fatima QamarCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Dimitrios MaragiannisCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Kinan Carlos El-TallawiCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Maan MalahfjiCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Dipan J ShahCardiovascular MRI Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, 6550 Fannin Street, Smith Tower - Suite 1801, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. DJShah@houstonmethodist.org.
Cornell University · USHouston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as a valuable imaging modality for the assessment of aortic regurgitation (AR). In this review, we discuss the assessment of AR severity, left ventricular (LV) remodeling, and tissue characterization by CMR while highlighting the latest studies and addressing future research needs. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have further established CMR-based thresholds of AR severity and LV remodeling that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, and lower than current guideline criteria. In addition, tissue profiling with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification can reliably assess adverse myocardial tissue remodeling which is also associated with adverse outcomes. The strengths and reproducibility of CMR in evaluating ventricular volumes, tissue characteristics, and regurgitation severity position it as an excellent modality in evaluating and following AR patients. Advanced CMR techniques for the detection of tissue remodeling have shown significant potential and merit further investigation.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve InsufficiencyFibrosisSeverity of Illness IndexVentricular RemodelingContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaAortic regurgitationCardiac magnetic resonanceMyocardial fibrosisMyocardial remodelingPhase-contrast imaging

Identifiers

PMID38517604
OpenAlexW4393074843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.