ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Sleep behavior after reverse shoulder replacement in comparison to a healthy control group : An exploratory cross-sectional study].
Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with shoulder pathologies frequently report sleep problems. Improving sleep quality is a treatment focus of shoulder arthroplasty. So far, it is unclear whether altered anatomy and biomechanics in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty affect sleep quality in the long term. In addition to a subjective evaluation, a reliable assessment can be obtained by recording objective sleep parameters. With the help of actigraphy, body movements are registered and divided into active and inactive phases by means of threshold values. Thanks to the valid correspondence with waking and sleeping phases, the calculation of objective sleep parameters is successful.
objectivesThe aims of the study were to investigate whether objective sleep parameters differ in persons with reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) 1 year postoperatively compared to a healthy control group and to explore what the reasons are. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe present work is an exploratory cross-sectional study with one measurement time point. 29 study participants (15 in the RTSA-group, 14 in the control group) collected objective sleep parameters and body position data during seven nights using actigraphy. The Mann-Whitney-U test was used for the mean comparison of sleep parameters. In addition, reasons for wakefulness were explored. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThe groups showed no significant differences in all objective sleep parameters with nearly identical sleep efficiency (p = 0.978). In the RTSA-group, 11% lay on the operated side and 65% on the back. This is just above the significance level compared to the control group with 45% in the supine position (p = 0.056). The increased use of the supine position could promote sleep-related medical conditions such as sleep apnoea and requires further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.