Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38517459›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Strategies to Mitigate Age-Related Bias in Machine Learning: Scoping Review.

Charlene Chu, Simon Donato-Woodger, Shehroz S Khan, Tianyu Shi, Kathleen Leslie, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Rune Nyrup, Amanda Grenier

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlene Chu *Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0333-7210
Simon Donato-Woodger *Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1442-0949
Shehroz S Khan *Knowledge, Innovation, Talent, Everywhere (KITE), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-4999
Tianyu Shi *Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4271-0871
Kathleen LeslieFaculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0581-126X
Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi *Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-1360
Rune Nyrup *Centre for Science Studies, Department of Mathematics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9880-6912
Amanda Grenier *Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto and Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2251-6035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that digital ageism, that is, age-related bias, is present in the development and deployment of machine learning (ML) models. Despite the recognition of the importance of this problem, there is a lack of research that specifically examines the strategies used to mitigate age-related bias in ML models and the effectiveness of these strategies.

objectiveTo address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of mitigation strategies to reduce age-related bias in ML.

methodsWe followed a scoping review methodology framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. The search was developed in conjunction with an information specialist and conducted in 6 electronic databases (IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the ACM digital library), as well as 2 additional gray literature databases (OpenGrey and Grey Literature Report).

resultsWe identified 8 publications that attempted to mitigate age-related bias in ML approaches. Age-related bias was introduced primarily due to a lack of representation of older adults in the data. Efforts to mitigate bias were categorized into one of three approaches: (1) creating a more balanced data set, (2) augmenting and supplementing their data, and (3) modifying the algorithm directly to achieve a more balanced result.

conclusionsIdentifying and mitigating related biases in ML models is critical to fostering fairness, equity, inclusion, and social benefits. Our analysis underscores the ongoing need for rigorous research and the development of effective mitigation approaches to address digital ageism, ensuring that ML systems are used in a way that upholds the interests of all individuals.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework AMG5P; https://osf.io/amg5p.

Indexed as

AgeismAgedAlgorithmsBiasDatabases, FactualHumansMachine Learningageageingageismagingalgorithmalgorithmic biasartificial intelligencebiasdigital ageismelderelderlygeriatricgerontologymachine learningolder adultolder peopleolder personreview methodologyreview methodsscopingsearchsearchingsynthesis

Identifiers

PMID38517459
PMCPMC10998175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.