ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2024
Utility of a Short-Form Phonemic Fluency Task.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonlinear association between age and verbal fluency and moderation by adiposity: cross-sectional evidence from the Look Up 8+ study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cognitive Effect of Levetiracetam in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2025Review
- Lingo: an automated, web-based deep phenotyping platform for language ability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveto establish a proof-of-concept and ascertain the reliability of an abbreviated 30-second (30s) phonemic fluency measure as a cognitive screening tool in older adults.
methodsin all, 201 English-speaking individuals with normal cognition (NC; n = 119) or cognitive impairment (CI; mild CI or dementia; n = 82) were administered a standard 60s phonemic fluency task (FAS/CFL) with discrete 30s intervals denoted.
resultsfor all letters, 30s trial scores significantly predicted 60s scores for the same letter, R2 = .7-.9, F(1, 200) = 850-915, p < .001. As with 60s total scores, 30s cumulative scores (for all three trials) were significantly different between NC and CI groups (p < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that 30s total scores distinguished NC and CI groups as effectively (AUC = .675) as 60s total scores (AUC = .658).
conclusionsthese findings support the utility and reliability of a short-form phonemic fluency paradigm, as 30s performance reliably predicted 60s/trial totals and was equally accurate in distinguishing impaired/non-impaired groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.