Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516594›Full record

ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2024

The medicinal chemistry evolution of antibody-drug conjugates.

Adrian D Hobson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current Trends in Clinical Trials of Prodrugs.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Photocatalyzed elaboration of antibody-based bioconjugates.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian D HobsonAbbVie Bioresearch Center, 381 Plantation Street, Worcester Massachusetts 01605 USA adrian.hobson@abbvie.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3948-0577
AbbVie (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise 3 components of wildly differing sizes: antibody (150 000 Da), linker (typically <500 Da) and payload (typically <500 Da). While the drug-linker makes up only a small percent of the ADC it has a disproportionately massive impact on all aspects of the ADC. Replacing maleimide with bromoacetamide (BrAc) affords stable attachment of the linker to the antibody cysteine, supports total flexibility for linker design and affords a more homogenous ADC. Optimisation of the protease cleavable dipeptide reduces aggregation, facilitates moderation of the physicochemical properties of the ADC and enables long-term stability to facilitate subcutaneous self-administration. Payloads are designed specifically to afford the optimal ADC. Structural information and SAR guide design to improve both potency and selectivity to the small molecule target improving the therapeutic index of resulting ADCs. Minimising the solvent exposed hydrophobic surface area improves the drug-like properties of the ADC, the realisation that the attachment heteroatom can be more than just the site for linker attachment as it can also drive potency and selectivity of the payload and the adoption of a prodrug strategy at project initiation are key areas that medicinal chemistry drives. For an optimal ADC the symbiotic relationship of the three structurally disparate components requires they all function in unison and medicinal chemistry has a huge role to ensure this happens.

Identifiers

PMID38516594
PMCPMC10953486
OpenAlexW4392251221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.