ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Treatment Strategies for Male Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolactin-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are more common in women. Male patients may also have few symptoms and have macroadenomas extending outside the sella turcica. This study aimed to report the results of cabergoline treatment in male patients with prolactin-secreting PitNET. The study included nine male patients aged 26-65 years (median, 46 years) diagnosed with prolactin-secreting PitNETs. The age at onset, prolactin values, tumor size, symptoms, and treatment were assessed. The mean prolactin value at the initial presentation was 2734.6 ng/mL, and the mean maximum tumor diameter was 40.4 mm. Visual field disturbance was the most common symptom (44.4%), followed by headaches (33.3%), asymptomatic symptoms (11.1%), and galactorrhea (11.1%). Eight patients responded to cabergoline treatment with normalization of prolactin levels and tumor shrinkage. One patient did not respond to the cabergoline treatment and required surgical intervention. There were no cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Cabergoline was found to be an effective treatment for male prolactin-secreting PitNETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.