ArticleCureus2024
Utility of Platelet Indices as Prognostic Markers of Sepsis: A Medical Intensive Care Unit-Based Cross-Sectional Study at a Rural Setup.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Marked Non-Infectious Elevation of Procalcitonin in a Hemodialysis Patient with Bladder Cancer: A Case Report.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- In-hospital survival characteristics and predictive model for patients with malignant tumors and sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Platelet Indices in Patients With Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Sepsis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Platelet Indices as Novel Surrogate Markers for the Prognosis of COVID-19 Infection: An Observational Study.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Even after the breakthrough advancements in the management and prognostic scoring of sepsis, it remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality encountered in intensive care units (ICUs) throughout the globe. This study highlights the utility of platelet indices as prognostic markers of sepsis. Methods In the present prospective cross-sectional study, a total of 177 patients with sepsis were enrolled using the Sepsis-3 criteria. The platelet indices were then linked to severity using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. The correlation of platelet indices to morbidity in terms of the length of ICU stay, need for a mechanical ventilator, types of infection, and mortality was also assessed. Results The results showed that mean platelet volume (p = 0.004) and platelet distribution width (PDW; p = 0.009) were positively correlated with the severity of sepsis. Among all the parameters, plateletcrit (%) was the best predictor of the need for an invasive mechanical ventilator at a cutoff point of ≤0.22 with a 60.90% chance of correctly predicting the need for an invasive mechanical ventilator, as was mortality at a cutoff point of ≤0.22 with a 67.30% chance of correct prediction. Among the platelet indices, only PDW showed a significant association with growth in culture because patients with growth had significantly higher PDW as compared to those who did not have growth (22.4 ± 4.47 vs 20.81 ± 4.29, p = 0.011). Conclusion The difference between the survivors and non-survivor groups was statistically significant for platelet indices, making them easily available, cost-effective, and useful prognostic markers for patients in septic shock. This will help in easy understanding and preventing its morbid complications, even at the primary care physician level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.