ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2024
Why cultural distance can promote - or impede - group-beneficial outcomes.
Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceived versus Objective Cultural Distance: Differential Effects on Acculturation Experiences.Journal of cross-cultural psychology · 2026Article
- Disclosing Group Members' Identities Reduces Cooperation in an Artefactual Public Goods Field Experiment.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Self-organized institutions in evolutionary dynamical-systems games.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Opening strategies in the game of go from feudalism to superhuman AI.Evolutionary human sciences · 2025Article
- Perceived inequality and variability in the expression of parochial altruism.Evolutionary human sciences · 2025Article
- Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying the distance between cultural groups has received substantial recent interest. A key innovation, borrowed from population genetics, is the calculation of cultural
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.