Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516289›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024

Knowledge and practices related to antibiotics among poultry producers and veterinarians in two Indian states.

Garima Sharma, Tushar Kumar Dey, Razibuddin Ahmed Hazarika, Bibek Ranjan Shome, Rajeshwari Shome, Vijay Pal Singh, Ram Pratim Deka, Delia Grace, Johanna F Lindahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Garima SharmaDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tushar Kumar DeyDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Razibuddin Ahmed HazarikaDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorahat, India.
Bibek Ranjan ShomeNational Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bangalore, India.
Rajeshwari ShomeNational Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bangalore, India.
Vijay Pal SinghInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Delhi, India.
Ram Pratim DekaDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Delia GraceDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Johanna F LindahlDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Uppsala University · SENational Institute Of Veterinary Epidemiology And Disease Informatics · INAssam Agricultural University · INInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INInternational Livestock Research Institute · KENatural Resources Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibiotics are frequently utilized in livestock, particularly poultry, for therapy and growth promotion, resulting in antimicrobial resistance. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are frequent in poultry samples from India. The purpose of this study was to better understand main antibiotic consumption patterns in poultry value chains, as well as antibiotic knowledge and practices among the stakeholders. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Assam and Karnataka, India. The poultry farmers were interviewed on antibiotic usage, antibiotic knowledge, feeding practices, and preventive measures on the farm. Poultry farmers reported their veterinarians, and we also interviewed them on knowledge and practices related to antimicrobial use in poultry and antimicrobial resistance. Item response theory (IRT) was used to assess the association between the answers and demographic factors. Results: This survey interviewed 62 poultry farmers and 11 veterinarians. Small poultry farms with fewer than 4000 birds were owned by 51.6% of farmers. Most poultry farmers had heard about antibiotics, and 62.9% thought they cured all diseases. If one chicken is sick, 72.6% said others should be given antibiotics to prevent the disease. All veterinarians utilized tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and cephalexin on the poultry farms. Over half (54.5%) stated antibiotics prevent diseases, and 72.7% said they treat and prevent diseases. Some (45.5%) said antibiotics boost growth. IRT analysis showed that 8 questions assessed a knowledge scale well. Univariable analysis showed that Assam farmers and women were likely to have have more knowledge. Conclusion: The poultry farmers were mostly unaware of the relation between antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. Despite being aware, the veterinarians agreed with use antibiotics as a prophylactic measure. It is vital that these stakeholders understand the repercussions of such widespread antibiotic use. In order to increase knowledge, frequent trainings and antimicrobial stewardship programmes with effective communication and incentives for behaviour change should be conducted.

Indexed as

AntibioticsAntimicrobial resistanceChickenPoultry farmersPoultry value chain

Identifiers

PMID38516289
PMCPMC10955645
OpenAlexW4392452696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.