ArticleOncoimmunology2024
STING is significantly increased in high-grade glioma with high risk of recurrence.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- STING signaling pathway: An oasis in the glioblastoma immune desert.Theranostics · 2026Review
- STING agonism in brain tumours: mechanisms, challenges, and therapeutic advances.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Mutation patterns and prognostic potentiality of homologous recombination repair genes in gliomas.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Identification of an efficient immunohistochemical panel for precise differential diagnosis of sebaceous carcinoma of eyelid.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The STING Signaling: A Novel Target for Central Nervous System Diseases.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- KDM1A epigenetically enhances RAD51 expression to suppress the STING-associated anti-tumor immunity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to comprehensively characterize the potential relationships among the frequently mutated genes, well-known homologous recombination repair (HRR) proteins, and immune proteins in glioma from a clinical perspective. A total of 126 surgical tissues from patients initially diagnosed with glioma were included. The genetic alterations were tested using the targeted next-generation sequencing technique. The expression of HRR proteins, immune proteins, and genetic alteration-related proteins were detected using immunostaining. Integrated analysis showed that ATRX is positively correlated with STING in high-grade glioma (HGG) with wild-type ATRX and IDH1. Then, a relapse predictive risk-scoring model was established using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithms. The scores based on the expression of ATRX and STING significantly predict the recurrence for glioma patients, which further predict the survival for specific subgroups, characterized with high expression of RAD51 and wild-type TERT. Moreover, STING is significantly higher in patients with high relapse risk. Interestingly, STING inhibitors and agonists both suppress the growth of HGG cells, regardless of their STING levels and STING pathway activity, whereas RAD51 inhibitor B02 is found to exclusively sensitize HGG cells with high expression of STING to temozolomide
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.