Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516256›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2024

Oh, the places you'll go! A qualitative study of resident career decisions in emergency medicine.

Jaime Jordan, Jack Buckanavage, Jonathan Ilgen, Michael Gottlieb, Laura R Hopson, Adam Janicki, Mark Curato, Anne K Chipman, Samuel O Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fellowship Training After Four-year Emergency Medicine Residency.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaime JordanDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6573-7041
Jack BuckanavageDrexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Jonathan IlgenDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375
Laura R HopsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-4751
Adam JanickiDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6013-177X
Mark CuratoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-6387
Anne K ChipmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Samuel O ClarkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine UC Davis Sacramento California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-1727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Postresidency career choices are complex decisions that involve personal, professional, and financial preferences and may be influenced by training programs. It is unknown how residents navigate these decisions during emergency medicine (EM) residency. We explored EM residents' perspectives on career decision making and how residency programs can support career planning. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews at seven accredited EM residency programs from diverse locations and training formats. We used purposive sampling to reflect the diversity of trainees with regard to gender, level of training, and career plans. Two researchers independently coded the transcripts. We used a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm to guide our thematic analysis. Results: We interviewed 11 residents and identified major themes in three categories. Residents described being exposed to career options through formalized curricula such as required rotations, career fairs, and subspeciality tracks, highlighting the importance of access to faculty with diverse areas of clinical and academic expertise. Many noted that exposure was often self-driven. We identified three major themes regarding career decisions: instrumental factors, people involved, and processes of decision making. Instrumental factors included personal interests, goals, and values as well as practice characteristics, financial considerations, timing, and opportunity costs. Mentors and family were highly involved in resident career decisions. Residents often utilized reflection and conversations with mentors and peers in their decision-making process. Participants recommended that programs provide exposure to diverse career options early in training, protect time for career education, and ensure adequate mentorship and a supportive community. Participants suggested specific curricular content and strategies to support career decisions. Conclusions: This study illuminates important factors involved in resident career decision making and how programs can support their trainees. Essential components include diverse experiences and building a reflective mentorship environment.

Identifiers

PMID38516256
PMCPMC10951628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.