Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516199›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2024

Genome editing in macroalgae: advances and challenges.

Jonas De Saeger, Emma Coulembier Vandelannoote, Hojun Lee, Jihae Park, Jonas Blomme

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. An animal-type NaFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonas De SaegerBio Environmental Science and Technology (BEST) Lab, Ghent University Global Campus, Yeonsu-gu, Republic of Korea.
Emma Coulembier VandelannooteDepartment of Biology, Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Hojun LeeBio Environmental Science and Technology (BEST) Lab, Ghent University Global Campus, Yeonsu-gu, Republic of Korea.
Jihae ParkBio Environmental Science and Technology (BEST) Lab, Ghent University Global Campus, Yeonsu-gu, Republic of Korea.
Jonas BlommeDepartment of Biology, Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Global Campus · KRGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This minireview examines the current state and challenges of genome editing in macroalgae. Despite the ecological and economic significance of this group of organisms, genome editing has seen limited applications. While CRISPR functionality has been established in two brown (

Indexed as

CRISPRgenome editingmacroalgaereverse geneticsseaweed biotechnologyseaweed breeding

Identifiers

PMID38516199
PMCPMC10955705
OpenAlexW4392552892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.