Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38516122›Full record

ReviewOtology & neurotology open2023

Diagnostic Yield and Utility of Radiographic Imaging in the Evaluation of Pulsatile Tinnitus: A Systematic Review.

Austin C Cao, Tiffany P Hwa, Caitlin Cavarocchi, Alexandra Quimby, Steven J Eliades, Michael J Ruckenstein, Douglas C Bigelow, Omar A Choudhri, Jason A Brant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Otology & neurotology open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Austin C CaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Tiffany P HwaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Caitlin CavarocchiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Alexandra QuimbyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Steven J EliadesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Michael J RuckensteinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Douglas C BigelowDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Omar A ChoudhriDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Jason A BrantDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess diagnostic yield of imaging modalities used to evaluate patients presenting with pulsatile tinnitus (PT). Databases Reviewed: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were queried using the search terms "pulsatile tinnitus," "pulse-synchronous tinnitus," and "pulse synchronous tinnitus" with no date limitations. Methods: Studies that reported diagnostic imaging for patients presenting with PT were included. Data were reviewed for sample size, gender, age, imaging study, indications, and diagnoses. The primary outcome measure from aggregated data was the yield of positive diagnoses made with each imaging modality. The quality of evidence was assessed for risk of bias. Results: From an initial search of 1145 articles, 17 manuscripts met inclusion criteria, of which 12 studies evaluated individual imaging modalities. The number of unique patients included was 1232. The diagnostic yield varied between modalities: carotid ultrasound (21%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12%-35%), CT temporal bone (65%, CI: 20%-93%), computed tomographic angiography (86%, CI: 80%-90%), and MRI/magnetic resonance angiography (58%, CI: 43%-72%). Conclusion: Studies on the diagnostic approach to PT are limited by heterogeneity in both inclusion criteria and reporting standards. A wide range of imaging modalities are used in practice during the initial evaluation of PT, and the diagnostic yield for imaging can be improved by utilizing more specific clinical indications.

Indexed as

DiagnosisImagingMeta-analysisPulsatile tinnitusSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38516122
PMCPMC10950154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.