ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2024
Appreciable biosafety, biocompatibility and osteogenic capability of 3D printed nonstoichiometric wollastonite scaffolds favorable for clinical translation.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- DLP bioprinting of cartilage organoid-laden bioinks yields high-fidelity auricular constructs with enhanced chondrogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Novel injectable and wet bonding bone adhesive: physicochemical characterization and biocompatibility evaluation.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Assisted Development of Injectable, Mechanically Robust, and Energy Metabolism-Modulating Brushite Cements.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Basic research is the foundation and driving force for clinical translation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alveolar bone destruction due to periodontal disease often requires a bone graft substitute to reconstruct the anatomical structures and biological functions of the bone tissue. Despite significant advances in the development of foreign ion-doped nonstoichiometric wollastonite bioceramics (CaSiO Methods: Six percent Mg-doped nCSi bioceramic scaffolds were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP), and the scaffold morphology, pore architecture, compressive strength, in vitro biodegradation, and apatite-forming ability of the bioceramic scaffolds were investigated systematically. Subsequently, an alveolar bone defect rabbit model was used to evaluate the biocompatibility and osteogenic efficacy of the nCSi bioceramics. Animal weight, hematological test, blood biochemical test, wet weight of the main organs, and pathological examination of the main organs were conducted. Micro-CT and histological staining were performed to analyze the osteogenic potential of the personalized bioceramic scaffolds. Results: The nCSi scaffolds exhibited appreciable initial compressive strength (>30 MPa) and mild mechanical decay over time during in vitro biodissolution. In addition, the scaffolds induced apatite remineralization in SBF. Bioceramic scaffolds have been proven to have good biocompatibility in vivo after implantation into the alveolar bone defect of rabbits. No significant effects on the hematological indices, blood biochemical parameters, organ wet weight, or organ histopathology were detected from 3 to 180 days postoperatively. The porous scaffolds exhibited strong bone regeneration capability in the alveolar bone defect model of rabbits. Micro-CT and histological examination showed effective maintenance of bone morphology in the bioceramic scaffold group; however, depressed bone tissue was observed in the control group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that personalized nCSi bioceramic scaffolds can be fabricated using the DLP technique. These newly developed strong bioceramic scaffolds exhibit good biocompatibility and osteogenic capability in vivo and have excellent potential as next-generation oral implants. The translational potential of this article: Tissue-engineered strategies for alveolar bone repair require a bone graft substitute with appreciable biocompatibility and osteogenic capability. This article provides a systematic investigation of the in vivo biosafety and osteogenic property of nCSi to further development of a silicate-based bioceramics materials for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.