Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515891›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2022

Telerehabilitation acceptance among patients during Circuit Breaker period: A retrospective study.

Boo Keong Fang, Jaclyn Jieying Jiang, Jonathan Kok Seng Loh, Shiek Abdullah Bin Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boo Keong FangYishun Health, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Singapore.
Jaclyn Jieying JiangYishun Health, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Singapore.
Jonathan Kok Seng LohYishun Health, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Singapore.
Shiek Abdullah Bin IsmailYishun Health, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation (TR) was viewed as an ideal alternative to minimize infection risks with in-person rehabilitation. However, TR acceptability remains unclear as it is an unfamiliar mode of interaction for most patients. We aim to retrospectively: (i) review the uptake rate of TR among patients, and (ii) explore their perceived barriers and facilitators of the service. Design: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted among eligible patients who were offered TR. Research data was extracted from medical records. Additionally, an anonymous patient satisfaction survey was conducted among the successfully enrolled patients, and the feedback was extracted from the form.gov.sg server. Results: 24·2% of the 314 eligible patients were successfully enrolled into TR. Preference for in-person rehabilitation was the top reason cited for declining the service. Among the 157 patients who declined the service, 38·2% of them preferred in-person rehabilitation over TR. Conclusions: A low uptake of TR services was demonstrated, with preference for in-person rehabilitation being the majority cited reason for decline. Reconciling the differences in patients' perceptions between in-person rehabilitation and TR may improve uptake rates.

Indexed as

Health servicesOutpatientRehabilitationTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38515891
PMCPMC10953890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.