ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2023
Evaluation of improvements in plan quality with Photon Optimizer v16.1 for single brain lesion SRS treatment.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the Photon Optimizer (PO) version 16.1 algorithm with its earlier version PO v13.6 and with Progressive Resolution Optimizer (PRO) version 13.6 algorithms. Materials and methods: 20 patients with single brain lesions treated with the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique were retrospectively selected for this study. Initially, for all patients volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SRS plans were generated with the PRO v 13.6 algorithm. Then, all the plans were re-generated with two versions 13.6 and 16.1 of PO algorithm using the same setup and dose-volume optimization objectives as that of PRO with a similar planning approach. The quality of the generated plans was analysed using ICRU 91 plan evaluation parameters and also using dice similarity co-efficient (DSC), centre of mass distance (CMD) between target and prescription isodose line, Monitor units (MU) and brain-gross tumor volume (GTV) 12 Gy volume. Paired Student t-test was used for statistical analysis with 0.05 as a significant value. Results: PO v16.1 improved all the dosimetric parameters studied compared to PO 13.6, the difference is statistically significant for all the parameters (p < 0.05), except for median dose and brain-GTV 12 Gy volume. PO v16.1 also showed statistically significant improvement for all the dosimetric parameters evaluated, except DSC and conformity index (CI), compared to PRO v13.6. Conclusion: The PO v16.1 generated plans are dosimetrically superior to PO v13.6 and PRO v13.6 in terms of target dose coverage and dose gradient with lesser beam modulation and plan complexity for single brain lesion SRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.