ReviewDialogues in health2023
Patient engagement with psychological safety.
Review in Dialogues in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological safety and shared decision-making for patient engagement in care quality.BMJ open quality · 2026Review
- The Role of Self-Compassion and Body Perception in Predicting Psychological Safety.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Perceived Impact of a Junior-Senior Inpatient Team Model on Clinical Workflow, Supervision, and Workload in a Tertiary Gastroenterology Department: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Supporting Basic Psychological Needs in Medical Education: A Patient Best Practice.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Observational
- Systematic Health Guidance and Psychological Nursing Intervention: Effects on Emotions, Sleep Quality, and Self-Efficacy in Cerebral Hemorrhage Patients.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Patient-Clinician Communication Among Adults With and Without Serious Illness.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Psychological Safety in the Medical Care of Black Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients and Families.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological safety is a multidimensional, dynamic phenomenon that concerns team members' perception of whether it is safe to take interpersonal risks at work. It is particularly important within health care teams who need to work interdependently to coordinate safe patient care within a highly complex, variable and high-stakes work environment. High levels of psychological safety have clear benefits for patient safety by improving the delivery of clinical care and promoting health care providers' job satisfaction and well-being. Feeling psychologically safe can enable team members to engage in speaking up behavior, such as asking questions, pointing out mistakes, or reporting errors. Several studies have explored psychological safety in health care teams and its impact on patient safety. These studies have highlighted the importance of psychological safety in health care organizations and provided strategies for promoting psychological safety. Psychological safety in health care involvement with patients can improve patient engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.