Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515661›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Evolutionary origins of Fibonacci phyllotaxis in land plants.

Takuya Okabe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takuya OkabeGraduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, 3-5-1 Johoku, Hamamatsu, 432-8561, Japan.
Shizuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibonacci phyllotaxis is commonly seen in all major groups of land plants. While a precise correlation is found between the internal pattern of the primary vascular system and the external pattern of appendages on the stem surface, it remains a big question how this regularity of Fibonacci phyllotaxis came into being in the course of evolution. Here I address this problem with a model describing phylogenetic and ontogenetic changes in vascular phyllotaxis based on two hypotheses. The first is that the Fibonacci pattern of vascular connection is uniquely determined by the primary arrangement of incipient primordia, the sources of the primary signal system in vascular tissue differentiation. The second is that the surface-area-to-volume ratio of primary vascular tissues serves as a measure of fitness in evolution. The model explains the empirical rule on the manner in which vascular connection is reconfigured during ontogeny, especially during juvenile development. Fossil and phylogenetic evidence suggests that Fibonacci phyllotaxis appeared shortly after the innovation of indefinite lateral organ initiation in a regular sequence.

Indexed as

HeteroblastyPhyllotaxis transitionPlant anatomyPlant morphologySize-structure correlation

Identifiers

PMID38515661
PMCPMC10955312
OpenAlexW4392769369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.