Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515551›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024

Enhancing patient outcomes: the role of clinical utility in guiding healthcare providers in curating radiology AI applications.

Franziska Lobig, Jacob Graham, Apeksha Damania, Brian Sattin, Joana Reis, Prateek Bharadwaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franziska LobigDigital & Commercial Innovation, Pharmaceuticals, MACS Radiology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Jacob GrahamLife Sciences, Guidehouse Inc, New York, NY, United States.
Apeksha DamaniaLife Sciences, Guidehouse Inc, New York, NY, United States.
Brian SattinLife Sciences, Guidehouse Inc, New York, NY, United States.
Joana ReisDigital & Commercial Innovation, Pharmaceuticals, MACS Radiology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Prateek BharadwajDigital & Commercial Innovation, Pharmaceuticals, MACS Radiology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) dominating the headlines, diagnostic imaging radiology is no exception to the accelerating role that AI is playing in today's technology landscape. The number of AI-driven radiology diagnostic imaging applications (digital diagnostics) that are both commercially available and in-development is rapidly expanding as are the potential benefits these tools can deliver for patients and providers alike. Healthcare providers seeking to harness the potential benefits of digital diagnostics may consider evaluating these tools and their corresponding use cases in a systematic and structured manner to ensure optimal capital deployment, resource utilization, and, ultimately, patient outcomes-or clinical utility. We propose several guiding themes when using clinical utility to curate digital diagnostics.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical utilitydigital healthimaging diagnosticsradiology

Identifiers

PMID38515551
PMCPMC10955074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.