Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Predicting postinterventional rupture of intracranial aneurysms using arteriography-derived radiomic features after pipeline embolization.

Chao Ma, Shikai Liang, Fei Liang, Ligong Lu, Haoyu Zhu, Xianli Lv, Xuejun Yang, Chuhan Jiang, Yupeng Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chao Ma *School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shikai Liang *School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Fei LiangDepartment of Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ligong LuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai Interventional Medical Center, Zhuhai Hospital, Affiliated with Jinan University, Zhuhai, China.
Haoyu ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xianli LvDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xuejun YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Chuhan JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yupeng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tsinghua University · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNZhuhai People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Postinterventional rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains a severe complication after flow diverter treatment. However, potential hemodynamic mechanisms underlying independent predictors for postinterventional rupture of IAs remain unclear. In this study, we employed arteriography-derived radiomic features to predict this complication. Methods: We included 64 patients who underwent pipeline flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms, distinguishing between 16 patients who experienced postinterventional rupture and 48 who did not. We performed propensity score matching based on clinical and morphological factors to match these patients with 48 patients with postinterventional unruptured IAs at a 1:3 ratio. Postinterventional digital subtraction angiography were used to create five arteriography-derived perfusion parameter maps and then radiomics features were obtained from each map. Informative features were selected through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method with five-fold cross-validation. Subsequently, radiomics scores were formulated to predict the occurrence of postinterventional IA ruptures. Prediction performance was evaluated with the training and test datasets using area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix-derived metrics. Results: Overall, 1,459 radiomics features were obtained, and six were selected. The resulting radiomics scores had high efficacy in distinguishing the postinterventional rupture group. The AUC and Youden index were 0.912 (95% confidence interval: 0.767-1.000) and 0.847 for the training dataset, respectively, and 0.938 (95% confidence interval, 0.806-1.000) and 0.800 for the testing dataset, respectively. Conclusion: Radiomics scores generated using arteriography-derived radiomic features effectively predicted postinterventional IA ruptures and may aid in differentiating IAs at high risk of postinterventional rupture.

Indexed as

angiographyhemodynamicsintracranial aneurysmperfusionpropensity score

Identifiers

PMID38515449
PMCPMC10954779
OpenAlexW4392613319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.