Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515364›Full record

SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Endovascular biopsy in neurointerventional surgery: A systematic review.

Oleg Shekhtman, Georgios S Sioutas, Gennadii Piavchenko, Shubhang Bhalla, Daniel L Cooke, Ethan Winkler, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gene therapy for intracranial aneurysms: systemic review.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oleg ShekhtmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-9539
Georgios S SioutasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3937-4029
Gennadii PiavchenkoDepartment of Human Anatomy and Histology, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Shubhang BhallaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daniel L CookeDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ethan WinklerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jan-Karl BurkhardtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Visish M SrinivasanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionEndothelial cells (ECs) continuously line the cerebrovasculature. Molecular aberrations in the ECs are hallmarks and contributory factors to the development of cerebrovascular diseases, including intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Endovascular biopsy has been introduced as a method to harvest ECs and obtain relevant biologic information. We aimed to summarize the literature on endovascular biopsy in neurointerventional surgery.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search in multiple databases, identifying eligible studies focusing on neurosurgical applications of endovascular biopsy. The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The relevant information was collected, including study characteristics, biopsy techniques, and key findings.ResultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. The studies involved the collection of ECs using various endovascular devices including coils, guide wires, different stents, and forceps. Endothelial-enrichment techniques, such fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), collected ECs and facilitated downstream applications of bulk or single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). The studies provided insights into gene expression profiles and identified potential biomarkers associated with intracranial aneurysms. However, challenges were observed in obtaining an adequate number of ECs and identifying consistent biomarkers.ConclusionEndovascular biopsy of endothelial cells (ECs) in cerebrovascular pathologies shows promise for gene expression profiling. However, many studies have been limited in sample size and underpowered to identify "signature genes" for aneurysm growth or rupture. Advancements in minimally invasive biopsy methods have potential to facilitate applications of precision medicine in the treatment of cerebrovascular disorders.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular DisordersEndovascular ProceduresBiopsyEndothelial CellsHumansIntracranial Aneurysmendothelial cellsEndovascular biopsyfluorescence-activated cell sortingintracranial aneurysmssingle cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)

Identifiers

PMID38515364
PMCPMC11569772
OpenAlexW4393095084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.