Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515236›Full record

SynthesisMicrobiologyOpen2024

Using meta-analysis to understand the impacts of dietary protein and fat content on the composition of fecal microbiota of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): A pilot study.

Francis D Phimister, Rachel C Anderson, David G Thomas, Michelle J Farquhar, Paul Maclean, Ruy Jauregui, Wayne Young, Christina F Butowski, Emma N Bermingham

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in MicrobiologyOpen, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francis D PhimisterAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
Rachel C AndersonAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
David G ThomasSchool of Agricultural and Environment, Massey University, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
Michelle J FarquharWaltham Petcare Science Institute, Waltham on the Wolds, Leicestershire, UK.
Paul MacleanAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
Ruy JaureguiAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
Wayne YoungAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
Christina F ButowskiAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.
Emma N BerminghamAgResearch Ltd, Manawatu-Whanganui, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0952-5260
AgResearch · NZMassey University · NZ

Funding

AgResearchMars Petcare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interplay between diet and fecal microbiota composition is garnering increased interest across various host species, including domestic dogs. While the influence of dietary macronutrients and their associated microbial communities have been extensively reviewed, these reviews are descriptive and do not account for differences in microbial community analysis, nor do they standardize macronutrient content across studies. To address this, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of dietary crude protein ("protein") and dietary crude fat ("fat") on the fecal microbiota composition in healthy dogs. Sixteen publications met the eligibility criteria for the meta-analysis, yielding a final data set of 314 dogs. Diets were classed as low, moderate, high, or supra in terms of protein or fat content. Sequence data from each publication were retrieved from public databases and reanalyzed using consistent bioinformatic pipelines. Analysis of community diversity indices and unsupervised clustering of the data with principal coordinate analysis revealed a small effect size and complete overlap between protein and fat levels at the overall community level. Supervised clustering through random forest analysis and partial least squares-discriminant analysis indicated alterations in the fecal microbiota composition at a more individual taxonomic level, corresponding to the levels of protein or fat. The Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 group and Enterococcus were associated with increasing levels of protein, while Allobaculum and Clostridium sensu stricto 13 were associated with increasing levels of fat. Interestingly, the random forest analyses revealed that Sharpea, despite its low relative abundance in the dog's fecal microbiome, was primarily responsible for the separation of the microbiome for both protein and fat. Future research should focus on validating and understanding the functional roles of these relatively low-abundant genera.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaWolvesAnimalsDietDietary ProteinsDogsFecesPilot ProjectsDietary Proteinscaninecrude fatcrude proteinmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID38515236
PMCPMC10958101
OpenAlexW4393076709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.