ArticleBMC oral health2024
Effect of blood lead levels on periodontitis in American adults: a cross-sectional analysis from the national health and nutrition examination survey.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association of lead and cadmium exposure with periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Obesity and periodontitis: a comprehensive review of their interconnected pathophysiology and clinical implications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of blood lead levels on the development and progression of periodontitis.
methodsThis study included 8600 participants from the National Nutrition and Health Examination Survey conducted the United States between 2009 and 2014. The exposure variable was the blood lead level, while the outcome variable was periodontitis. To evaluate the relationship between the blood lead level and periodontitis, a multivariate logistic regression model was used.
resultsA positive association was observed between blood lead levels and the risk of periodontitis in Model 1 (OR = 7.04, 95% CI = 5.95-8.31). After adjusting for age (continuous), sex, ethnicity, and BMI (continuous) in Model 2, the significant association between blood lead levels and periodontitis risk remained evident (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 2.54-3.70). Consequently, even after comprehensive adjustment for potential confounding factors in Model 3, the robust association between blood lead levels and periodontitis risk persisted (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.67-2.60). When considering the serum lead concentration as a categorical variable and after adjusting for potential confounders in Model 3, we observed that the odds ratios (ORs) of periodontitis in the T2 (0.94 µg/dL-1.60 µg/dL) and T3 (lead ≥ 1.60 µg/dL) groups increased from 1.27 (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.44) to 1.57 (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.36-1.81) compared to T1 group. Subgroup analysis revealed no effect modifiers.
conclusionsOur main findings suggest that there is no safe range of blood lead levels regarding periodontitis risk and that increasing blood lead levels can significantly increase the prevalence of periodontitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.