Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515150›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Evaluation of a disability-inclusive ultra-poor graduation programme in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial with process evaluation.

Elijah Kipchumba, Calum Davey, Sarah Marks, Anthony Mugeere, Shanquan Chen, Lena Morgon Banks, Kazi Eliza Islam, Tom Shakespeare, Hannah Kuper, Munshi Sulaiman

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elijah Kipchumba *Independent Evaluation and Research Cell (IERC), BRAC International, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-6802
Calum Davey *International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-3030
Sarah MarksInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-3694
Anthony MugeereDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-9901
Shanquan ChenInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-4892
Lena Morgon BanksInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4585-1103
Kazi Eliza IslamBRAC International, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tom ShakespeareInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-2787
Hannah Kuper *International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. hannah.kuper@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8952-0023
Munshi Sulaiman *BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6061-933X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little evidence on how to support ultra-poor people with disabilities to adopt sustainable livelihoods. The Disability-Inclusive Graduation (DIG) programme targets ultra-poor people with disabilities and/or women living in rural Uganda. The programme is an adaptation of an ultra-poor graduation model that has been shown to be effective in many contexts but not evaluated for people with disabilities.

methodsThe DIG programme works with project participants over a period of 18 months. Participants receive unconditional cash transfers for 6 months, training, access to savings-and-loans groups, and a capital asset that forms the basis of their new livelihood. The programme is also adapted to address specific barriers that people with disabilities face. Eligible households are clustered by geographical proximity in order to deliver the intervention. Eligibility is based on household screening to identify the 'ultra-poor' based on proxy means testing-both households with and without people with disabilities are included in the programme. Clusters are randomly selected prior to implementation, resulting in 96 intervention and 89 control clusters. The primary outcome of the trial is per-capita household consumption. Before the start of the intervention, a baseline household survey is conducted (November 2020) among project participants and those not offered the programme, a similar endline survey is conducted with participants with disabilities at the end of programme implementation in July 2022, and a second endline survey for all participants in October 2023. These activities are complemented by a process evaluation to understand DIG programme implementation, mechanisms, and context using complementary qualitative and quantitative methods. Ethical approval for the research has been received from Mildmay Uganda Research Ethics Committee and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. DISCUSSION: DIG is a promising intervention to evaluate for people with disabilities, adapted to be disability inclusive across programme components through extensive consultations and collaboration, and has proven efficacy at reducing poverty in other marginalised groups. However, evaluating a well-evidenced intervention among a new target group poses ethical considerations.

trial registrationRegistry for International Development Impact Evaluations, RIDIE-STUDY-ID-626008898983a (20/04/22). ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN78592382 . Retrospectively registered on 17/08/2023.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesSchoolsFemaleHumansIncomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaDisabilityFinancial supportIncome generationRandomised controlled trialSocial protection

Identifiers

PMID38515150
PMCPMC10956226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.