Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38515081›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

How older adults manage misinformation and information overload - A qualitative study.

M Vivion, V Reid, E Dubé, A Coutant, A Benoit, A Tourigny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Internet Use and Self-Rated Health Among Older Adults: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M VivionDepartment of Social and Preventive Medecine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. maryline.vivion@fmed.ulaval.ca.
V ReidCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
E DubéCHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
A CoutantLaboratoire sur la communication et le numérique (LabCMO), Montreal, Canada.
A BenoitGDR AREES (Groupe de recherche: Arctique: Enjeux pour l'environnement et les sociétés) du CRNS, Paris, France.
A TourignyInstitut sur le vieillissement et la participation sociale des aînés de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MM1: 174884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by an abundance of information, some of it reliable and some of it misinformation. Evidence-based data on the impact of misinformation on attitudes and behaviours remains limited. Studies indicate that older adults are more likely to embrace and disseminate misinformation than other population groups, making them vulnerable to misinformation. The purpose of this article is to explore the effects of misinformation and information overload on older adults, and to present the management strategies put in place to deal with such effects, in the context of COVID-19.

methodsA qualitative exploratory approach was adopted to conduct this research. A total of 36 semi-structured interviews were conducted with older adults living in Quebec, Canada. The interviews were fully transcribed and subjected to a thematic content analysis.

resultsParticipants said they could easily spot misinformation online. Despite this, misinformation and its treatment by the media could generate fear, stress and anxiety. Moreover, the polarization induced by misinformation resulted in tensions and even friendship breakdowns. Participants also denounced the information overload produced largely by the media. To this end, the participants set up information routines targeting the sources of information and the times at which they consulted the information.

conclusionsThis article questions the concept of vulnerability to misinformation by highlighting older adults' agency in managing misinformation and information overload. Furthermore, this study invites us to rethink communication strategies by distinguishing between information overload and misinformation.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAgedAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCommunicationHumansQualitative ResearchCOVID-19Information overload, social media, informational practicesMisinformationOlder adults, Quebec

Identifiers

PMID38515081
PMCPMC10956171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.