Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514891›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Technical considerations for cost-effective transposon directed insertion-site sequencing (TraDIS).

Yasuhiro Kyono, Madeline Tolwinski, Stephanie A Flowers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasuhiro KyonoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 S Wood St. #125B, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Madeline TolwinskiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 S Wood St. #125B, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Stephanie A FlowersDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 S Wood St. #125B, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. flowers9@uic.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposon directed insertion-site sequencing (TraDIS), a variant of transposon insertion sequencing commonly known as Tn-Seq, is a high-throughput assay that defines essential bacterial genes across diverse growth conditions. However, the variability between laboratory environments often requires laborious, time-consuming modifications to its protocol. In this technical study, we aimed to refine the protocol by identifying key parameters that can impact the complexity of mutant libraries. Firstly, we discovered that adjusting electroporation parameters including transposome concentration, transposome assembly conditions, and cell densities can significantly improve the recovery of viable mutants for different Escherichia coli strains. Secondly, we found that post-electroporation conditions, such as recovery time and the use of different mediums for selecting mutants may also impact the complexity of viable mutants in the library. Finally, we developed a simplified sequencing library preparation workflow based on a Nextera-TruSeq hybrid design where ~ 80% of sequenced reads correspond to transposon-DNA junctions. The technical improvements presented in our study aim to streamline TraDIS protocols, making this powerful technique more accessible for a wider scientific audience.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsGenes, BacterialBase SequenceCost-Benefit AnalysisEscherichia coliGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutagenesis, InsertionalDNA Transposable ElementsElectroporationEscherichia coliIllumina library preparationTransposon insertion sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38514891
PMCPMC10958030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.