Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Short-term restoration practices change the bacterial community in degraded soil from the Brazilian semiarid.

Davila Esmelinda Oliveira Silva, Romario Martins Costa, Janaira Rocha Campos, Sandra Mara Barbosa Rocha, Arthur Prudencio de Araujo Pereira, Vania Maria Maciel Melo, Francisca Andrea Silva Oliveira, Francisco de Alcantara Neto, Lucas William Mendes, Ademir Sergio Ferreira Araujo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Davila Esmelinda Oliveira SilvaSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Romario Martins CostaSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Janaira Rocha CamposSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Sandra Mara Barbosa RochaSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Arthur Prudencio de Araujo PereiraFederal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Vania Maria Maciel MeloFederal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Francisca Andrea Silva OliveiraFederal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Francisco de Alcantara NetoPlant Science Department, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Lucas William MendesCenter for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Ademir Sergio Ferreira AraujoSoil Microbial Ecology Group, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil. asfaruaj@yahoo.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land degradation by deforestation adversely impacts soil properties, and long-term restoration practices have been reported to potentially reverse these effects, particularly on soil microorganisms. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the short-term effects of restoration on the soil bacterial community in semiarid areas. This study evaluates the bacterial community in soils experiencing degradation (due to slash-and-burn deforestation) and restoration (utilizing stone cordons and revegetation), in comparison to a native soil in the Brazilian semiarid region. Three areas were selected: (a) under degradation; (b) undergoing short-term restoration; and (c) a native area, and the bacterial community was assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing on soil samples collected during both dry and rainy seasons. The dry and rainy seasons exhibited distinct bacterial patterns, and native sites differed from degraded and restoration sites. Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria phyla exhibited higher prevalence in degraded and restoration sites, respectively, while Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were more abundant in sites undergoing restoration compared to degraded sites. Microbial connections varied across sites and seasons, with an increase in nodes observed in the native site during the dry season, more edges and positive connections in the restoration site, and a higher occurrence of negative connections in the degradation site during the rainy season. Niche occupancy analysis revealed that degradation favored specialists over generalists, whereas restoration exhibited a higher prevalence of generalists compared to native sites. Specifically, degraded sites showed a higher abundance of specialists in contrast to restoration sites. This study reveals that land degradation impacts the soil bacterial community, leading to differences between native and degraded sites. Restoring the soil over a short period alters the status of the bacterial community in degraded soil, fostering an increase in generalist microbes that contribute to enhanced soil stability.

Indexed as

BacteriaSoilAcidobacteriaBrazilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAmplicon sequencingLand degradationSemiarid soilsSoil microbial ecology

Identifiers

PMID38514851
PMCPMC10957980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.