Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Complexity synchronization in emergent intelligence.

Korosh Mahmoodi, Scott E Kerick, Piotr J Franaszczuk, Thomas D Parsons, Paolo Grigolini, Bruce J West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Korosh MahmoodiUS Combat Capabilities Command, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA. koroshmahmoodi@gmail.com.
Scott E KerickUS Combat Capabilities Command, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.
Piotr J FranaszczukUS Combat Capabilities Command, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.
Thomas D ParsonsComputational Neuropsychology Simulation Laboratory, Edson College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85004, USA.
Paolo GrigoliniCenter for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, 76203, USA.
Bruce J WestCenter for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, 76203, USA.

Funding

Army Research Laboratory W911NF-16-2-0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we use a simple multi-agent-based-model (MABM) of a social network, implementing selfish algorithm (SA) agents, to create an adaptive environment and show, using a modified diffusion entropy analysis (DEA), that the mutual-adaptive interaction between the parts of such a network manifests complexity synchronization (CS). CS has been shown to exist by processing simultaneously measured time series from among organ-networks (ONs) of the brain (neurophysiology), lungs (respiration), and heart (cardiovascular reactivity) and to be explained theoretically as a synchronization of the multifractal dimension (MFD) scaling parameters characterizing each time series. Herein, we find the same kind of CS in the emergent intelligence of groups formed in a self-organized social interaction without macroscopic control but with biased self-interest between two groups of agents playing an anti-coordination game. This computational result strongly suggests the existence of the same CS in real-world social phenomena and in human-machine interactions as that found empirically in ONs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsIntelligenceEntropyHumansAdaptive environmentComplexity synchronizationEmergent intelligenceModified diffusion entropy analysisMulti-agent-based-modelingReinforcement learningSelfish algorithm

Identifiers

PMID38514808
PMCPMC10958045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.