Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Role of compliant mechanics and motor control in hopping - from human to robot.

Aida Mohammadi Nejad Rashty, Maziar A Sharbafi, Omid Mohseni, André Seyfarth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aida Mohammadi Nejad RashtyLauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, Institute of Sport Science and Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64289, Germany. aidamnr@sport.tu-darmstadt.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-4181
Maziar A SharbafiLauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, Institute of Sport Science and Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64289, Germany.
Omid MohseniLauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, Institute of Sport Science and Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64289, Germany.
André SeyfarthLauflabor Locomotion Laboratory, Institute of Sport Science and Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64289, Germany.
Technische Universität Darmstadt · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) AH307/4-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GRK2761/1-2022Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SE1042/42-1Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst (Hessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts) Förderbuchungskreis 2995Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst (Hessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts) Whitebox - Kapitel 15 02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compliant leg function found during bouncy gaits in humans and animals can be considered a role model for designing and controlling bioinspired robots and assistive devices. The human musculoskeletal design and control differ from distal to proximal joints in the leg. The specific mechanical properties of different leg parts could simplify motor control, e.g., by taking advantage of passive body dynamics. This control embodiment is complemented by neural reflex circuitries shaping human motor control. This study investigates the contribution of specific passive and active properties at different leg joint levels in human hopping at different hopping frequencies. We analyze the kinematics and kinetics of human leg joints to design and control a bioinspired hopping robot. In addition, this robot is used as a test rig to validate the identified concepts from human hopping. We found that the more distal the joint, the higher the possibility of benefit from passive compliant leg structures. A passive elastic element nicely describes the ankle joint function. In contrast, a more significant contribution to energy management using an active element (e.g., by feedback control) is predicted for the knee and hip joints. The ankle and knee joints are the key contributors to adjusting hopping frequency. Humans can speed up hopping by increasing ankle stiffness and tuning corresponding knee control parameters. We found that the force-modulated compliance (FMC) as an abstract reflex-based control beside a fixed spring can predict human knee torque-angle patterns at different frequencies. These developed bioinspired models for ankle and knee joints were applied to design and control the EPA-hopper-II robot. The experimental results support our biomechanical findings while indicating potential robot improvements. Based on the proposed model and the robot's experimental results, passive compliant elements (e.g. tendons) have a larger capacity to contribute to the distal joint function compared to proximal joints. With the use of more compliant elements in the distal joint, a larger contribution to managing energy changes is observed in the upper joints.

Indexed as

RoboticsAnkleAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKneeKnee JointLeg

Identifiers

PMID38514699
PMCPMC10957903
OpenAlexW4393038473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.