ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2024
Priorities, needs and willingness of use of nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI): an Australian survey.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gaps in recovery priorities between individuals with spinal cord injury and healthcare professionals.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designAnonymous online survey
objectivesTo investigate the priorities, needs and willingness to adopt nerve stimulation devices for managing neurogenic bladder and bowel function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in Australia.
settingOnline survey of people living with SCI in Australia.
methodsThis anonymous online survey used Qualtrics and was advertised via standard communication channels, such as advocacy groups representing the SCI community in Australia, social media, attending SCI sporting events and by word-of-mouth.
resultsResponses from 62 individuals (32% female, 68% male) were included. Bladder emptying through urethra without catheter was the highest priority for bladder function. Reducing time required for bowel routines and constipation were the top priorities regarding bowel function. The highest concern for internal/implanted devices was the 4% chance of device surgical removal, while wearing wires under the clothes was the main concern for external devices. 53% of respondents were willing to trial an implanted nerve stimulation device, while 70% would trial an external device to improve and gain independence in bladder and bowel function.
conclusionThe findings of this study highlighted the potential role in which nerve stimulation can have in addressing bladder and bowel dysfunction in people with SCI, and have also identified that there was a need for Australian physiotherapists to evaluate their role in bladder and bowel dysfunction. Results from this study can help guide further research in nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel dysfunction in people with SCI. SPONSORSHIP: n/a.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.