ArticleEndocrine2024
Dietary composition and time in range in population with type 2 diabetes mellitus-exploring the association using continuous glucose monitoring device.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current landscape and comprehensive management of glycemic variability in diabetic retinopathy.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo understand the association between macronutrient composition of a diet with Time in Range (TIR), Time above Range (TAR) and Time below Range (TBR) derived using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) device for 14 days. METHODOLOGY: An exploratory analysis on the baseline data of 50 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus participants with age 25-55 years, HbA1c upto 8% and on Metformin only) enrolled for an interventional clinical trial was performed.
resultsParticipants consuming adequate carbohydrates (CHO) of 55 to 60% of total calories had better Average Blood Glucose of 142.0 ± 24.0 mg/dL with a significance of p = 0.03 and Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) of 6.6 ± 0.7% significant at p = 0.01, than those with high CHO intake >60% of the total calories, with Average Blood Glucose - 155.0 ± 13.4 mg/dL and GMI - 7.06 ± 0.4%. Similarly, TIR - 68.2 ± 5.1% and TAR - 23.0 ± 10.8% was significantly better (p = 0.00) among those consuming adequate protein (12-15%) as compared to low protein (≤ 10%) with TIR- 61.0 ± 5.1% & TAR- 32.9 ± 10.3%. A correlation (r = -0.482 & p = 0.00) and simple linear regression analysis (R² = 0.33, F = 7.72, p = 0.000) revealed that when CHO intake increases the TIR decreases whereas TAR increases (r = 0.380 & p = 0.006). We did not find any significant relation between fat intake and TIR, TAR or TBR.
conclusionOur results suggest that lowering CHO, while increasing protein in the diet may help improve TIR. Further in-depth studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38514590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.