Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514589›Full record

ArticleBotanical studies2024

Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of Camellia sinensis grown under various cultivations in different seasons.

Chung-I Chen, Kuan-Hung Lin, Meng-Yuan Huang, Chih-Kai Yang, Yu-Hsiu Lin, Mei-Li Hsueh, Li-Hua Lee, Shiou-Ruei Lin, Ching-Wen Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Botanical studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chung-I Chen *Department of Forestry, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung County, 91201, Taiwan.
Kuan-Hung Lin *Department of Horticulture and Biotechnology, Chinese Culture University, Taipei City, 11114, Taiwan.
Meng-Yuan HuangDepartment of Life Sciences and Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung City, 40227, Taiwan.
Chih-Kai YangDepartment of Forestry, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung County, 91201, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsiu LinTaiwan Biodiversity Research Institute, Nantou County, 552, Taiwan.
Mei-Li HsuehTaiwan Biodiversity Research Institute, Nantou County, 552, Taiwan.
Li-Hua LeeTaiwan Biodiversity Research Institute, Nantou County, 552, Taiwan.
Shiou-Ruei LinTea and Beverage Research Station, Taoyuan City, 326, Taiwan. fumonisin226@gmail.com.
Ching-Wen WangTaiwan Biodiversity Research Institute, Nantou County, 552, Taiwan. kilorsoul@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-388X
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology · TWBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWChinese Culture University · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TWQuanta Computer (Taiwan) · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sod culture (SC) and conventional agriculture (CA) represent two distinct field management approaches utilized in the cultivation of tea plants in Taiwan. In this study, we employed gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence techniques to assess the impact of SC and CA methods on the photosynthetic machinery of Camellia sinensis cv. TTES No.12 (Jhinhsuan) in response to variable light intensities across different seasons. In spring, at photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) ranging from 800 to 2,000 μmol photon m

Indexed as

Chlorophyll fluorescencePhotosynthetic capacitySod cultureTea plant

Identifiers

PMID38514589
PMCPMC10957798
OpenAlexW4393092311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.