Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514517›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Reflections upon the intrauterine repair of myelomeningocele.

Giuseppe Talamonti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giuseppe TalamontiDep. of Neurosurgery, ASST Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy. tala_nch@yahoo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-3292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrauterine repair of myelomeningocele presents certain advantages and has gained widespread acceptance. It significantly reduces the incidence of Chiari-2 anomalies and hydrocephalus, and it is thought to enhance the neurologic outcome. Nevertheless, several issues remain unsettled and there are no negligible disadvantages. After working with patients with myelomeningocele for 30 years, I thought about how we currently treat them. There are ethical, organizational, neurological, obstetrical, and postnatal aspects worth discussing.

Indexed as

Arnold-Chiari MalformationHydrocephalusMeningomyeloceleHumansIncidenceMultidisciplinary managementMyelomeningocelePediatricPostnatal surgeryPrenatal surgerySpinal dysraphism

Identifiers

PMID38514517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.