Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514400›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Advancing entity recognition in biomedicine via instruction tuning of large language models.

Vipina K Keloth, Yan Hu, Qianqian Xie, Xueqing Peng, Yan Wang, Andrew Zheng, Melih Selek, Kalpana Raja, Chih Hsuan Wei, Qiao Jin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Information extraction from clinical notes: are we ready to switch to large language models?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Vipina K KelothSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-1122
Yan HuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science at Houston, Houston, TX-77030, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-2413-5918
Qianqian XieSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.
Xueqing PengSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.
Yan WangSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.
Andrew ZhengWilliam P. Clements High School, Sugar Land, TX-77479, United States.
Melih SelekStephen F. Austin High School, Sugar Land, TX-77498, United States.
Kalpana RajaSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.
Chih Hsuan WeiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD-20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5094-7321
Qiao JinNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD-20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-7239
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD-20894, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9998-916X
Qingyu ChenSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-1516
Hua XuSection of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT-06510, United States.

Funding

Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Biomedical ApplicationsZIALM237241 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2023 to 2025
$12.2M
Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
PheBC: bias correction methods for EHR derived phenotypeR01LM013519 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG, XU, HUA · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Natural language processing and medical imaging analysis for multi-modality computer assisted diagnosis of ophthalmic diseasesK99LM014024 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, QINGYU · 2023 to 2023
$92k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154NIH HHS R01AG078154NLM NIH HHS K99 LM014024NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLarge Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to revolutionize the field of Natural Language Processing, excelling not only in text generation and reasoning tasks but also in their ability for zero/few-shot learning, swiftly adapting to new tasks with minimal fine-tuning. LLMs have also demonstrated great promise in biomedical and healthcare applications. However, when it comes to Named Entity Recognition (NER), particularly within the biomedical domain, LLMs fall short of the effectiveness exhibited by fine-tuned domain-specific models. One key reason is that NER is typically conceptualized as a sequence labeling task, whereas LLMs are optimized for text generation and reasoning tasks.

resultsWe developed an instruction-based learning paradigm that transforms biomedical NER from a sequence labeling task into a generation task. This paradigm is end-to-end and streamlines the training and evaluation process by automatically repurposing pre-existing biomedical NER datasets. We further developed BioNER-LLaMA using the proposed paradigm with LLaMA-7B as the foundational LLM. We conducted extensive testing on BioNER-LLaMA across three widely recognized biomedical NER datasets, consisting of entities related to diseases, chemicals, and genes. The results revealed that BioNER-LLaMA consistently achieved higher F1-scores ranging from 5% to 30% compared to the few-shot learning capabilities of GPT-4 on datasets with different biomedical entities. We show that a general-domain LLM can match the performance of rigorously fine-tuned PubMedBERT models and PMC-LLaMA, biomedical-specific language model. Our findings underscore the potential of our proposed paradigm in developing general-domain LLMs that can rival SOTA performances in multi-task, multi-domain scenarios in biomedical and health applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Datasets and other resources are available at https://github.com/BIDS-Xu-Lab/BioNER-LLaMA.

Indexed as

Camelids, New WorldDeep LearningAnimalsLanguageNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID38514400
PMCPMC11001490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.