Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38514193›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Identification of Early Hippocampal Dynamics during Recognition Memory with Independent Component Analysis.

Víctor J López-Madrona, Agnès Trébuchon, Ioana Mindruta, Emmanuel J Barbeau, Andrei Barborica, Costi Pistol, Irina Oane, F Xavier Alario, Christian G Bénar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Víctor J López-MadronaInst Neurosci Syst, INS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille 13005, France victor.lopez-madrona@univ-amu.fr.
Agnès TrébuchonEpileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, APHM, Timone Hospital, Marseille 13005, France.
Ioana MindrutaPhysics Department, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Emmanuel J BarbeauCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse, Toulouse 31052, France.
Andrei BarboricaPhysics Department, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-3769
Costi PistolPhysics Department, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Irina OanePhysics Department, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
F Xavier AlarioAix Marseille University, CNRS, LPC, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-5034
Christian G BénarInst Neurosci Syst, INS, INSERM, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille 13005, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampus is generally considered to have relatively late involvement in recognition memory, its main electrophysiological signature being between 400 and 800 ms after stimulus onset. However, most electrophysiological studies have analyzed the hippocampus as a single responsive area, selecting only a single-site signal exhibiting the strongest effect in terms of amplitude. These classical approaches may not capture all the dynamics of this structure, hindering the contribution of other hippocampal sources that are not located in the vicinity of the selected site. We combined intracerebral electroencephalogram recordings from epileptic patients with independent component analysis during a recognition memory task involving the recognition of old and new images. We identified two sources with different responses emerging from the hippocampus: a fast one (maximal amplitude at ∼250 ms) that could not be directly identified from raw recordings and a latter one, peaking at ∼400 ms. The former component presented different amplitudes between old and new items in 6 out of 10 patients. The latter component had different delays for each condition, with a faster activation (∼290 ms after stimulus onset) for recognized items. We hypothesize that both sources represent two steps of hippocampal recognition memory, the faster reflecting the input from other structures and the latter the hippocampal internal processing. Recognized images evoking early activations would facilitate neural computation in the hippocampus, accelerating memory retrieval of complementary information. Overall, our results suggest that the hippocampal activity is composed of several sources with an early activation related to recognition memory.

Indexed as

EpilepsyRecognition, PsychologyElectroencephalographyHippocampusHumansMemoryERPhippocampushumaniEEGindependent component analysismemory recognition

Identifiers

PMID38514193
PMCPMC10993203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.