ArticleUrologia internationalis2024
Modified Ileal Conduit for Pelvic Lipomatosis: Technique Description and Outcome.
Article in Urologia internationalis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pelvic lipomatosis-a rare diagnosis and a challenging management: a case report and literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to present the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of modified ileal conduit for pelvic lipomatosis (PL).
methodsFrom 2020 to 2022, we prospectively enrolled 9 patients with PL undergoing modified ileal conduit. The patient characteristics, perioperative variables, and follow-up outcomes as well as the description of surgical technique were reported.
resultsAll 9 patients successfully completed the operation. Two patients had perioperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade I. The mean operation time and bleeding volumes were 253 ± 51.4 min and 238.9 ± 196.9 mL, with a mean postoperative follow-up time of 13.0 ± 5.6 months. The postoperative 3-month and 1-year creatinine values were significantly decreased versus the preoperative (p = 0.006 and p = 0.024). The postoperative 3-month and 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate values were significantly increased compared with those before operation (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.018). The separation value of left renal pelvis collection system after operation was significantly reduced compared with preoperative evaluation (p = 0.023 at 3 months and p = 0.042 at 1 year) and so was the right side (p = 0.019 and p = 0.023).
conclusionModified ileal conduit is safe and feasible for PL. A large sample cohort with long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.