Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38513356›Full record

ReviewReproduction & fertility2024

Harnessing the power within: engineering the microbiome for enhanced gynecologic health.

Caitriona Brennan, Kristina Chan, Tanya Kumar, Erica Maissy, Linda Brubaker, Marisol I Dothard, Jack A Gilbert, Katharine E Gilbert, Amanda L Lewis, Varykina G Thackray and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. All Properties of Infertility Microbiome in a Review Article.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitriona BrennanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3943-6701
Kristina ChanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3676-2333
Tanya KumarMedical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Erica MaissyDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Linda BrubakerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Marisol I DothardDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jack A GilbertDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Katharine E GilbertDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Amanda L LewisDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Varykina G ThackrayDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Amir ZarrinparDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Rob KnightDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

San Diego Digestive Diseases Research CenterP30DK120515 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Bernd G. Schnabl · 2019 to 2026
$10.8M
3D-bioprinting of sustained- and phased-release antibiotic and probiotic scaffolds to treat bacterial vaginosisR01AI168475 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FRIEBOES, HERMANN, LEWIS, AMANDA L. · 2022 to 2025
$3.0M
Understanding the Host-Microbiome-Therapeutic Triad: Implications for Designing Alternative Intravaginal Delivery Platforms to Treat Bacterial VaginosisR01AI139671 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FRIEBOES, HERMANN, LEWIS, AMANDA L. · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Role of the Gut Microbiome in Polycystic Ovary SyndromeR01HD095412 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI THACKRAY, VARYKINA G · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139671NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI168475NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095412NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK120515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Although numerous studies have demonstrated the impact of microbiome manipulation on human health, research on the microbiome's influence on female health remains relatively limited despite substantial disease burden. In light of this, we present a selected review of clinical trials and preclinical studies targeting both the vaginal and gut microbiomes for the prevention or treatment of various gynecologic conditions. Specifically, we explore studies that leverage microbiota transplants, probiotics, prebiotics, diet modifications, and engineered microbial strains. A healthy vaginal microbiome for females of reproductive age consists of lactic acid-producing bacteria predominantly of the Lactobacillus genus, which serves as a protective barrier against pathogens and maintains a balanced ecosystem. The gut microbiota's production of short-chain fatty acids, metabolism of primary bile acids, and modulation of sex steroid levels have significant implications for the interplay between host and microbes throughout the body, ultimately impacting reproductive health. By harnessing interventions that modulate both the vaginal and gut microbiomes, it becomes possible to not only maintain homeostasis but also mitigate pathological conditions. While the field is still working toward making broad clinical recommendations, the current studies demonstrate that manipulating the microbiome holds great potential for addressing diverse gynecologic conditions. Lay summary: Manipulating the microbiome has recently entered popular culture, with various diets thought to aid the microbes that live within us. These microbes live in different locations of our body and accordingly help us digest food, modulate our immune system, and influence reproductive health. The role of the microbes living in and influencing the female reproductive tract remains understudied despite known roles in common conditions such as vulvovaginal candidiasis (affecting 75% of females in their lifetime), bacterial vaginosis (25% of females in their lifetime), cervical HPV infection (80% of females in their lifetime), endometriosis (6-10% of females of reproductive age), and polycystic ovary syndrome (10-12% of females of reproductive age). Here, we review four different approaches used to manipulate the female reproductive tract and gastrointestinal system microbiomes: microbiota transplants, probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary interventions, and the use of engineered microbial strains. In doing so, we aim to stimulate discussion on new ways to understand and treat female reproductive health conditions.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaProbioticsAnimalsFemaleHumansPrebioticsReproductionPrebioticsbacterial vaginosisendometriosisgynecologic healthmicrobiome manipulationpolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38513356
PMCPMC11046331
OpenAlexW4392930517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.