Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38513149›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2024

The effect of diet composition on the diversity of active gut bacteria and on the growth of Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Loretta Mugo-Kamiri, Marina Querejeta, Ben Raymond, Elisabeth A Herniou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Loretta Mugo-KamiriInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, UMR 7261, CNRS - University of Tours, 37200 Tours, France.ORCID 0009-0008-6553-8457
Marina QuerejetaInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, UMR 7261, CNRS - University of Tours, 37200 Tours, France.
Ben RaymondCentre for Ecology and Conservation, Penryn Campus, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
Elisabeth A HerniouInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, UMR 7261, CNRS - University of Tours, 37200 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-6056
Université de Tours · FRUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

FEDER InfoBioS EX011185Marie Curie Action Horizon 2020 INSECTDOCTORS 859850'Plan de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion 2018-2022' AYUD/2021/58607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota plays a functional role in nutrition among several insects. However, the situation is unclear in Lepidoptera. Field studies suggest the microbiome may not be stable and is determined by diet, while in the laboratory, Lepidoptera are routinely reared on diet containing antibiotics with unknown effects on microbial communities. Furthermore, molecular approaches for the characterization of lepidopteran microbiomes rarely describe the metabolically active gut bacteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate how diet and antibiotics affect Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) growth and the diversity and activity of the gut bacteria community. We assessed how alfalfa and wheat germ-based diets affected larval growth, in the presence and absence of streptomycin. Alfalfa diet improved larval growth, pupal mass, and survival, but antibiotic was only beneficial in the wheat germ diet. We observed diet-driven changes in the gut bacterial communities. In the active community, the alfalfa colony was dominated by Enterococcus and Rhodococcus whereas in the wheat germ colony, only Enterococcus was present. In contrast, spore-forming Bacilli species were very common members of the DNA community. In both cases, streptomycin had a selective effect on the relative abundance of the taxa present. Our study highlights the importance of characterizing both the diversity and activity of the gut microbiota community. DNA-derived communities may include environmental DNA, spores, or non-viable bacteria, while RNA-derived communities are more likely to give an accurate representation of the diversity of active members that are potentially directly involved in the metabolic processes of the host.

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDietDNALarvaSpodopteraStreptomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNAStreptomycinantibioticscDNA metabarcodinginsect dietLepidopteramicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID38513149
PMCPMC10956968
OpenAlexW4393062891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.